Skip to content

update recursive-refac with sector_mapping (includes up-to-date develop branch) - #330

Merged
catherinebirney merged 658 commits into
recursive-refacfrom
sector_mapping
Apr 12, 2023
Merged

catherinebirney merged 658 commits into
recursive-refacfrom
sector_mapping

Conversation

@catherinebirney

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

relevant to recursive-refac:

  • sector hierarchy updates: 'aggregated' or 'disaggregated' ->' flat' or 'parent-completeChild' or 'parent-incompleteChild'
  • update map_to_sectors() to map differently depending on sector hierarchy
  • new functions:
    -- return_primary_activity_column()
    -- estimate_suppressed_sectors_equal_attribution()
  • updates to water_national_2015_m1 FBS to recursive method

relevant updates from master:

  • updates to GHG FBS
  • updates to github actions
  • new gov and household sector codes
  • new 7-digit waste management pathways
  • sankey diagrams
  • standard graph colors based on sectors
  • new FBA/FBS
  • new attribution sources col
  • material crosswalk mapping
  • begin to convert to use of pathlib Path

catherinebirney and others added 30 commits December 1, 2022 09:48
… kaleido to write static images if kaleido installed
update v1.3-release with develop
… rows caused by dropping metasources/attributionsources cols
# Conflicts:
#	requirements.txt
#	setup.py
catherinebirney and others added 26 commits April 6, 2023 15:42
Update GHGI method to v2.0
Update saving of file and metadata

@matthewlchambers matthewlchambers left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should all be basically fine, noting that I haven't tested all the additions to flowby.py. Also, in the recursive branch I don't think flowbysector.py is getting used much if at all, so I hope that the changes to flowbysector.py are accomplishing their intended goal.

@catherinebirney

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I think this should all be basically fine, noting that I haven't tested all the additions to flowby.py. Also, in the recursive branch I don't think flowbysector.py is getting used much if at all, so I hope that the changes to flowbysector.py are accomplishing their intended goal.

@matthewlchambers I updated sector_mapping with the most recent changes to develop/master branches, so the changes in flowbysector.py are not applicable to the recursive code.

Thanks for the review - I will go ahead and merge

@catherinebirney
catherinebirney merged commit 92c20e9 into recursive-refac Apr 12, 2023
@catherinebirney
catherinebirney deleted the sector_mapping branch April 12, 2023 19:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants