Skip to content

Add component scope evaluation policy - #6853

Merged
nscuro merged 4 commits into
DependencyTrack:mainfrom
adamtorokaccreativetg:issues-6095-2
Aug 4, 2026
Merged

nscuro merged 4 commits into
DependencyTrack:mainfrom
adamtorokaccreativetg:issues-6095-2

Conversation

@adamtorokaccreativetg

@adamtorokaccreativetg adamtorokaccreativetg commented Jul 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

This PR adds component policy evaluation policy with ComponentScopeCelPolicyScriptSourceBuilder.
The feature allows filtering components by their scope as a policy condition.

Addressed Issue

This PR addresses the following issue: #6095

Additional Details

Checklist

  • I have read and understand the contributing guidelines
    - [ ] This PR fixes a defect, and I have provided tests to verify that the fix is effective
  • This PR implements an enhancement, and I have provided tests to verify that it works as intended
    - [ ] This PR introduces changes to the database model, and I have updated the migration changelog accordingly
  • This PR introduces new or alters existing behavior, and I have updated the documentation accordingly
    - [ ] This PR is a substantial change (per the ADR criteria), and I have added an ADR under docs/adr/

Related PRs

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>
…ions

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>
@owasp-dt-bot

owasp-dt-bot commented Jul 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Jul 30, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage 100.00% diff coverage

Metric Results
Coverage variation Report missing for 57ae5f11
Diff coverage ✅ 100.00% diff coverage (70.00%)

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (57ae5f1) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (009640b) 43125 37471 86.89%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#6853) 1 1 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

1 Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>
@nscuro nscuro added this to the 5.1 milestone Aug 4, 2026
@nscuro nscuro added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 4, 2026
@nscuro
nscuro merged commit 5220936 into DependencyTrack:main Aug 4, 2026
17 of 18 checks passed
ElenaStroebele pushed a commit to ElenaStroebele/dependency-track that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
* Add (component) scope to policy.proto

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>

* Add ComponentScopeCelPolicyScriptSourceBuilder with related modifications

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>

* Fix test in ComponentScopeCelPolicyTest

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>

* Remove COMPONENT_SCOPE policy subject

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Adam Torok <torok.adam@accretivetg.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants