Repository navigation
Conversation
getObjectByUuid, used to resolve the new parent, triggers a query. Any JDO query flushes dirty state first, so if the parent block ran after setClassifier but before setCollectionLogic cleared it, converting a collection project back to a regular one while also changing its parent flushed a row with both fields set, violating PROJECT_COLLECTION_CLASSIFIER_check and surfacing as an uncaught 500. The same hazard is already handled a few lines below for the collection tag, which is resolved before collectionLogic is set for exactly this reason. Moving parent resolution to the top of the method, before any field is touched, applies the same fix: the query now runs while the object is still clean, so nothing is flushed early. Added a test reproducing the reported request shape: converting a collection project back to a regular one, with a classifier and a parent in the same request. Reverting the fix reproduces the original 500. hasActiveChild and getLatestProjectVersion also run queries between setClassifier and setCollectionLogic, for the isActive and isLatest branches respectively. Same hazard, not exercised by the reported case or by the added test, and not changed here to keep this fix scoped to what was reported and verified. Signed-off-by: adityaanikam <adityanikam9502@gmail.com>
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
| Metric | Results |
|---|---|
| Coverage variation | ✅ +0.01% coverage variation (-1.00%) |
| Diff coverage | ✅ 92.86% diff coverage (70.00%) |
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage Common ancestor commit (dc76b56) 44448 38824 87.35% Head commit (e7ddb2e) 44448 (+0) 38827 (+3) 87.35% (+0.01%) Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch:
<coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>
Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage Pull request (#7262) 14 13 92.86% Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified:
<covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%
NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.
nscuro
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, looks good. Please resolve the lint failure, then this is good to merge.
The Lint Java check failed on the test added in the previous commit: one assertion was longer than palantir-java-format allows. This only rewraps that line. Signed-off-by: adityaanikam <adityanikam9502@gmail.com>
* Resolve project parent before other fields in updateProject getObjectByUuid, used to resolve the new parent, triggers a query. Any JDO query flushes dirty state first, so if the parent block ran after setClassifier but before setCollectionLogic cleared it, converting a collection project back to a regular one while also changing its parent flushed a row with both fields set, violating PROJECT_COLLECTION_CLASSIFIER_check and surfacing as an uncaught 500. The same hazard is already handled a few lines below for the collection tag, which is resolved before collectionLogic is set for exactly this reason. Moving parent resolution to the top of the method, before any field is touched, applies the same fix: the query now runs while the object is still clean, so nothing is flushed early. Added a test reproducing the reported request shape: converting a collection project back to a regular one, with a classifier and a parent in the same request. Reverting the fix reproduces the original 500. hasActiveChild and getLatestProjectVersion also run queries between setClassifier and setCollectionLogic, for the isActive and isLatest branches respectively. Same hazard, not exercised by the reported case or by the added test, and not changed here to keep this fix scoped to what was reported and verified. Signed-off-by: adityaanikam <adityanikam9502@gmail.com> * Apply Spotless formatting to ProjectResourceTest The Lint Java check failed on the test added in the previous commit: one assertion was longer than palantir-java-format allows. This only rewraps that line. Signed-off-by: adityaanikam <adityanikam9502@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: adityaanikam <adityanikam9502@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 8f399b6) Signed-off-by: nscuro <nscuro@protonmail.com>
Description
ProjectQueryManager.updateProjectsets the new classifier on the persistent project, then resolves the new parent (if any) via agetObjectByUuidcall, and only clearscollectionLogicafterward.getObjectByUuidruns a query, and DataNucleus flushes pending dirty state before any query executes. If a request converts a collection project back to a regular one (clearingcollectionLogic, setting aclassifier) while also carrying aparent, that flush writes a row with bothclassifierandcollectionLogicnon-null, violating thePROJECT_COLLECTION_CLASSIFIER_checkdatabase constraint and surfacing as an uncaught 500 instead of the expected 200.This is the same class of hazard already documented and guarded a few lines below for
collectionTag(resolveTagsis deliberately called beforecollectionLogicis set, for the same reason) — parent resolution just wasn't given the same treatment.This PR moves parent resolution to the very start of
updateProject, before any field is set on the persistent object, so the query runs while it's still clean and nothing flushes prematurely. No other ordering changes.Scope note:
hasActiveChild(raw SQL) andgetLatestProjectVersion(JDOQL), used by theisActive/isLatestbranches, run queries in the same position in the method and have the same latent hazard. Neither is exercised by the reported issue or the added test, so I left them alone to keep this change scoped to what's reported and verified — flagging here in case a maintainer wants a follow-up.Addressed Issue
fixes #7241
Additional Details
Added
shouldConvertCollectionProjectBackToRegularWithParenttoProjectResourceTest, reproducing the exact reported request shape: a collection project's classifier is set,collectionLogicis omitted (cleared), and aparentis included in the samePOST /api/v1/projectbody. Verified it fails with the original 500 when the fix is reverted (with the test kept), and passes with the fix applied.Checklist
This PR implements an enhancement, and I have provided tests to verify that it works as intendedThis PR introduces changes to the database model, and I have updated the migration changelog accordinglyThis PR introduces new or alters existing behavior, and I have updated the documentation accordinglyThis PR is a substantial change (per the ADR criteria), and I have added an ADR underdocs/adr/